Sunday, November 14, 2004
Antigua beats long odds on Internet gambling challenge by US
AFP
Sunday, November 14, 2004
WASHINGTON (AFP) - Antigua and Barbuda beat long odds Wednesday as the World Trade Organisation confirmed a ruling that a ban in the United States on Internet gambling violates global trading rules.
The Geneva-based WTO, in a report released Wednesday, held that the US ban on web gambling is effectively an unfair trade barrier that hurts the gaming industry of the tiny two-island Caribbean nation.
US prohibitions on Internet gambling "are inconsistent with US obligations" under the 1995 General Agreement on Tariffs and Services, the WTO panel wrote in Geneva, affirming an interim decision in March.
In a statement, Antigua welcomed the decision and called it "reminiscent of the story of David and Goliath."
But Richard Mills of the office of the US Trade Representative called the decision "deeply flawed."
"We will vigorously appeal this deeply flawed report to the WTO Appellate Body and remain confident in the basis for reversing this panel report," he said.
A senior US trade official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that if the US appeal fails, Washington may simply revise its commitment under the GATS agreement to exclude gambling.
"The parties do retain rights to make changes under GATS," the official said.
The WTO panel ruling acknowledged that Washington may have intended to exclude gambling from the treaty but that Internet gambling is covered under the services agreement of global trade agreements.
"We have, therefore, some sympathy with the United States' point in this regard," the WTO panel wrote.
"However, the scope of a specific commitment cannot depend upon what a member intended or did not intend to do at the time of the negotiations."
A patchwork of regulations in US states regulate gambling, while federal laws ban any form of "interstate" betting.
US Justice Department officials contend that any Internet gambling is illegal, but prosecution has been spotty.
Washington also maintained that GATS allows each member country latitude in regulating "public morals."
But the WTO wrote that the arguments from Washington carry less weight because of the wide variety of gambling options that are legal in the United States.
Antigua had claimed it lost more than US$90 million and 4,000 jobs because of the US ban.
"The United States has taken an aggressive approach to betting services based overseas," the government said in a statement.
"However, the US government raises significant revenue from betting services within its own borders and the Interactive Gaming Council (trade group) suggests the United States is home to at least half the worldwide online gaming market."
"The US says it wants open competition," said Ronald Sanders, Antigua's former WTO ambassador. "But it only wants free trade when it suits the US."
AFP
Sunday, November 14, 2004
WASHINGTON (AFP) - Antigua and Barbuda beat long odds Wednesday as the World Trade Organisation confirmed a ruling that a ban in the United States on Internet gambling violates global trading rules.
The Geneva-based WTO, in a report released Wednesday, held that the US ban on web gambling is effectively an unfair trade barrier that hurts the gaming industry of the tiny two-island Caribbean nation.
US prohibitions on Internet gambling "are inconsistent with US obligations" under the 1995 General Agreement on Tariffs and Services, the WTO panel wrote in Geneva, affirming an interim decision in March.
In a statement, Antigua welcomed the decision and called it "reminiscent of the story of David and Goliath."
But Richard Mills of the office of the US Trade Representative called the decision "deeply flawed."
"We will vigorously appeal this deeply flawed report to the WTO Appellate Body and remain confident in the basis for reversing this panel report," he said.
A senior US trade official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that if the US appeal fails, Washington may simply revise its commitment under the GATS agreement to exclude gambling.
"The parties do retain rights to make changes under GATS," the official said.
The WTO panel ruling acknowledged that Washington may have intended to exclude gambling from the treaty but that Internet gambling is covered under the services agreement of global trade agreements.
"We have, therefore, some sympathy with the United States' point in this regard," the WTO panel wrote.
"However, the scope of a specific commitment cannot depend upon what a member intended or did not intend to do at the time of the negotiations."
A patchwork of regulations in US states regulate gambling, while federal laws ban any form of "interstate" betting.
US Justice Department officials contend that any Internet gambling is illegal, but prosecution has been spotty.
Washington also maintained that GATS allows each member country latitude in regulating "public morals."
But the WTO wrote that the arguments from Washington carry less weight because of the wide variety of gambling options that are legal in the United States.
Antigua had claimed it lost more than US$90 million and 4,000 jobs because of the US ban.
"The United States has taken an aggressive approach to betting services based overseas," the government said in a statement.
"However, the US government raises significant revenue from betting services within its own borders and the Interactive Gaming Council (trade group) suggests the United States is home to at least half the worldwide online gaming market."
"The US says it wants open competition," said Ronald Sanders, Antigua's former WTO ambassador. "But it only wants free trade when it suits the US."
